Wednesday, July 22, 2026
FINISHED READING - Lower Than The Angels by Diarmaid MacCulloch
Monday, July 20, 2026
PROTEST & PROGRESS - Kett's Rebellion
1549 - THE KETT'S REBELLION
Once the dissolution of the monasteries finally concluded in 1541, the question was, what happens to the vast landholding, the estates of these institutions? Henry 8th required cash more than land. He used former monastic land as capital to pay for his extravagances and palace building, but also as bribery to secure the allegiance of the nobility. There was a form of competitive tendering going on between landowners to obtain the prime richest most fertile bits of monastic farmland. This legitimised land grab took place right across the country. Illegal enclosure of common pasture had been going on for centuries, slowly nibbling away at its edges, undermining the very principle of commonly held pasture. And though officially such enclosures were illegal, unofficially a blind eye was taken towards them. Particular by those who made the law and it's enforcement, who were often the chief infringers of it. After a few years, who would remember it was once land set aside for peasants to graze their animals on?
East Anglia had still not reached the peak of its wool and weaving boom, that had turned it into one of the richest counties in England. Post the dissolution illegal enclosures were rife here. Agriculture which had been such an integral part of those institutions economic support system, was now in crisis. Without common land peasants had no where else to graze their livestock on. Large landowners forced tenant farmers off their land in order to incorporate it into their ever enlarging estates. Converting arable pasture into land suitable for raising sheep on, which was an incredibly profitable move. The whole 'wool' economy was now in danger of over heating, inflation and unemployment were rising, just as real wages were plummeting. With these sort of economic conditions a revolt of some sort was inevitable.
Tempers frayed and broke first in Wymondham in July 1549. In the previous month the lord of the manor in near by Attenborough has suddenly erected fences around common pasture land. These had angrily been torn down by local peasantry. Convinced they were acting within the law, because Edmund Seymour, The Lord Protector of the child King Edward 6th, had recently issued a proclamation declaring the illegality of such enclosures. After holding a celebration in what remained of monastic Wymondham Abbey, they marched over to two nearby villages, intent on removing fencing around common pasture, erected by Sir John Flowerdew, who'd overseen the dissolution at Wymondham. Showing a degree of malevolent cunning, Flowerdew bribed these rioters to go and attack his neighbour Robert Kett's enclosed land, and to leave his alone.
Robert Kett was fifty seven, a man from an old Wymondham farming family. He had been central in the saving of the Abbey Church for use by the town, which had put him in direct conflict with Sir John Flowerdew. To his credit, he recognised the grievances the rebels expressed, joined them and tore down his own fences and those of Flowerdew. Once Kett launched himself into full support of the rebellion, other villages and towns did likewise. They headed in ever great numbers towards Mousehold Heath, that looks down on the River Wensum and the City of Norwich. For the next six weeks the camp on the heath continued growing in size. Forming its own rudimentary council to run the camp and the campaign, beneath what came to be called Kett's Oak of Reformation.
Here they drew up a petition to deliver to the Protector Somerset, outlining twenty nine demands. Only one of those specifically related to the enclosure of common land. But most of the others were a mixture of semi- related concerns - limiting the interference of the gentry, particularly in relation to the villages, restraining the pace of change, the over exploiting of communal land and resources, reshaping the values of the clergy, a rent reduction and punishing corrupt officials. All the while fences across East Anglia around enclosures were being riotously dismantled. Eventually the rebels moved to take control of Norwich itself. This was the point when armed regiments began to arrive in ever increasing force, to free the city from rebel capture. A battle outside the city walls in August 1549, brought the rebellion to a brutal end. Huge numbers of rebels were hung from an entrance gate to the city. Kett was arrested and taken to the Tower of London, eventually to return to be hung from the walls of Norwich Castle in December, as an exemplary warning.
Initially the King's ministers made a great deal of negative propaganda out of 'the sins' of this rebellion. But over the subsequent centuries what Kett achieved during this rebellion transformed him into a folk hero. The level of organised opposition to the status quo, is what is most exemplary here. Rebels basically set up their own alternative ruling jurisdiction, with its own codes of behaviour. Nothing like this had been seen before in popular rebellions, which is why the authorities became so rattled. They did nothing to meet or appease the rebel demands, but came down hard upon them.
What this rebellion demonstrated was that the English countryside was in the midst of huge social changes, after the monasteries were destroyed. All they we're really asking for was for these upheavals to be managed better, the land grab to stop, and the needs of the common people to be taken into account. The entire way society was run needed urgent social, economic and religious reform. Kett's Rebellion was the first indication that the emerging Protestant religious reformation and more radical political ideologies were in the early stages of becoming entwined.
Next Episode - Uncivil & Civil War
Sunday, July 19, 2026
ART 'N' AB ART - Legacy - Brenda Unwin & Sarah Caputo - Cromer Art Space Exhibition
Thursday, July 16, 2026
2026 PLAYLIST No 16 - Alviverde by Jun Miyake & Arto Lindsay
Alviverde by Jun Miyake & Arto Lindsay
If you have seen the film Pina about the work of the choreographer and performer Pina Bauch, you will instantly be familiar with this tune. I , however, re-encountered it recently through my rooting about in Arto Lindsay's back catalogue, and You tube's algorithm did the rest. It is such an addictive tune, underpinned by that spritely double bass riff and the scattering percussive rhythm that dances around it propelling the music onwards. Over the top of this Arto Lindsay does his usual laid back oh so effortlessly cool singing. It is currently on repeat play on my daily music list.
SCREEN SHOT - Kingdom of Heaven ( 2005 ) Director's Cut
Tuesday, July 14, 2026
MY OWN WALKING - The Anniversary Issue
UNFINISHED READING - The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhardt by Bernard McGinn
This has been in my Book Pile for quite some time. So long, I can't quite remember when it first arrived, probably eighteen months ago. However, I found myself reticent to tackle it, in case it was really theologically too much for me. As it turned out, it was. I got halfway and skipped a whole chapter exploring the difference between God 'boiling over' and God 'boiling through' and I just thought- 'You know, this is not a distinction that has bothered me before, and I'm not going to start now.'
The book has been full of similarly detailed, and no doubt thorough, expositions of what Eckhardt's philosophic/mystical writings were supposedly about. Early on, I got the feeling, that perhaps I really should have bought a book with a selection of his teachings, rather than an academic commentary by a confirmed Eckhardt geek like McGinn. Nothing against the guy, he must know what he is on about, I presume. Had I read some Eckhardt cold beforehand, I'd know whether this book was genuinely further enlightening, or not. For most of the time I was struggling to sustain following his analysis,arguments and explanations. In these sorts of conditions, the quote from Eckhardt's writings I tended to find more lucid than the academic explanation, which merely, to my untrained eyes, succeeded in muddying the water further.
I suspect that this may be another serious case of my further cultivating an antipathy towards Christian theology. This often reads as a series of assertions about the nature of Jesus and God, which are either true and I'm just a bit too thick to fully grasp why that is so, or they are actually preposterous claims that no amount of convoluted exegesis is going to convince me otherwise. If I had a phenomenally clever mind I'd know which it was. It may come down to the specificity of theological language.
Over the years I've been willing to push the envelope of my intellectual limitations a fair way beyond it's comfort zone. Quite often to obtain the general gist, even if the precise detail still escapes me. But I have come to recognise when I've reached the actual limit of my ability to follow and comprehend what the heck someone is trying to communicate. As my brain cells get deeper fried in lard. Yes, it is humbling, to have to say I don't know what this guy is rambling at such length about. But this too, is good for me.
This may be theological wank or the most profound thing I've never understood. If only I had the sort of brain that could systematically deconstruct things, then I'd be able to explain in very lucid refined terms, why it is all wank. And I'd feel much better, or at least less prone to self justification. Instead of using the increased volume of dismissive curses as my expression of how wrong it is. As it is, I have to trust my gut intuition, which may of course be merely dyspeptic indigestion.
CARROT REVIEW - 3/8
Thursday, July 09, 2026
INSIGNIFICANT MOMENTS IN THE FOLDS OF TIME - Tricycle Tales
PROTEST & PROGRESS - The Pilgrimage of Grace
For the first twenty years of Henry 8th's reign he was the handsome youthful monarch who charmed his subjects. Though undoubtedly a cultured man, he ebulliently overindulged his extravagant tastes. His desire to divorce Katherine of Aragon and marry Anne Boylen entailed a split with Rome. His ambitions in France led to expensive wars which got him no where. The state of royal finances plummeted, and the country began to look on him less favourably. What turned all these factors into a people's rebellion was the dissolution of the monasteries.
It's hard for us, in our more secular times, to realise quite what an upheaval to the social fabric of 16th century England the dissolution was. Though the people had their issues with the way the monasteries behaved in relation to the local economy, these were institutions deeply embedded in their spiritual and economic lives. Monasteries provided social support through distributing alms, it's infirmary dispensed medicines and cared for the sick, besides generally ministering to the spiritual needs of the local area. The economy of a village or town undoubtedly thrived through supplying monasteries with goods, and bought bread and ale from them in return. Monasteries often became the site for a local weekly market, usually in its outer courtyard. The dissolution happened incredibly swiftly, within the space of roughly five years all of the monasteries were brought into the state of being ruins. Some buildings were converted into barns, parish churches or cathedrals. It was as though a wrecking ball had been swung through the heart of English society and it's religious culture smashed.
The rebellion,The Pilgrimage of Grace, had hence a multiplicity of economic causes, aggravated by the removal of monasteries from the local economy, without a thought for what the knock on consequences of that would be. The Pilgrimage of Grace became widespread with a rag bag alliance of grievances riding under one spiritual banner. It tapped into a huge amount of suppressed discontent in the country. Thomas Cromwell, as the designer of the dissolution, was the focus of it's ire. But let's be clear here, Henry was no longer that popular, nor held in high esteem by his people. His divorce was widely disapproved of, as was the split with Rome. He was becoming increasingly tyrannical, so it maybe not be deference, but more likely fear that made the rebels resist openly criticising him.
What had started as a little local difficulty in Lincolnshire, easily suppressed in the October, then broke out in Yorkshire, Cumberland, Northumberland and Durham. Robert Aske a London lawyer from North Yorkshire was chosen to bring leadership to the incipient rebellion. Under his guidance 9,000 rebels marched south and occupied York with relative ease. By the time they'd reached Doncaster the number of rebels was approximately 40,000. This was by far the largest rebellion of the Tudor era. The Duke of Norfolk and Earl of Shrewsbury were despatched to negotiate at Pontefract Castle. Aske helped the rebels compose their requests to the King. A document called 'The Commons Petition'. This contained twenty four demands, and was given to the Duke of Norfolk in December 1536.
It's estimated Norfolk and Shrewsbury's forces together totaled 12,000 men, so with a growing rebel force three times that, they faced being massacred if they were to try suppressing the rebellion. Norfolk attempted to placate the rebels by disingenuously stating the petition would be presented to the King, that there would be a general pardon, and the monastery closures would be halted til Parliament had met to discuss them. With these promises Aske was persuaded to disband the rebellion. Sir Francis Bigod, rightly as it turned out, was not convinced the King would honour Norfolk's promises. Without taking Aske's advice, he led his own minor rebellion in February 1537. This was the opportunity that Norfolk was looking for, brutally suppressing Bigod's rebellion, arresting both him and Robert Aske. Aske was hanged in chains in York. Bigod was hanged at Tyburn in London. A total of 216 rebel activists were executed, many if them nobility. Martial law was imposed across all the regions that had partaken in the Pilgrimage of Grace.
Historians argue about to what degree this was a popular revolt arising out of a genuine disquiet, and how much the involvement of significant nobility gave it more credence and hence popular backing from the common people. I would say choosing Robert Aske, a lawyer, to lead them had significance in this regard. That he was able to help in the formulating of 'The Commons Petition' a properly drawn up document from the people to their King, presenting their demands. It was more likely that Catholic minded nobility were piggy backing on the people's revolt. The more they were seen as instigating the people to rebel, the worse it would be for them. The rebels saw themselves as The Commons, the common people, with a common land, and a common faith, as a remnant of the medieval Catholic society that they saw the dissolution as casually defenestrating A petition from common people to their King, was the only way to present their views.
Sure, this was not the first time rebels had proffered a petition to a King, but there was something distinctly intentional and formal about how this one was being presented as coming from 'the Commons'. What we see in the Pilgrimage of Grace, is that this was not primarily a revolt over unfair taxes, but the beginnings of common people demanding their views be heard and taken into account in how society developed. After all, their lives and belief system had been completely upended, with no thought given to their feelings, wishes or the effect upon their lives.The disquiet here in 1536 amongst ordinary common people, only becomes more frustrated, intemperate and demanding over the next century.
Next episode - 1549 The Kett's Rebellion
Wednesday, July 08, 2026
ART N AB ART - Asteriodia - Salthouse Church Exhibtion
Scale alone is not the fundamental problem. This simply feels half baked conceptually, this stars above and stars below thing, the linking of the heavens with earth, the transcendent and the terrestrially grounded. Some how this feels far too light weight and the installation required much more imaginative effort to be brought to it. To dig a bit deeper than applying some basic imaginative associations to it. My overall impression was - of being underwhelmed, and when informed what the artistic premise of the installation was, still more underwhelmed. Remind me again, what is this supposed to say to me, because I really am not feeling this in my mythic gut?
CARROT REVIEW - 2/8
Tuesday, July 07, 2026
FINISHED READING - Don't Forget We're Here Forever by Lamorna Ash
Monday, July 06, 2026
ARTICLE - Malcolm Guite - Talking About The Imagination
Malcolm Guite is a poet, singer song writer, Anglican priest and academic. He is also one of humanity's natural enthusiasts, and even if you're unable to fully align with his religious perspective, you can find yourself being swept up in the sheer verve and lively momentum of his conversation. He has an unusual and engaging presence. Plus a phenomenal memory for poetry to boot.
In a hour long conversation available online (a link to which is at the bottom of this transcript) he recounts the influence of his Mother reciting poetry at the drop of what, his own appreciation for Tolkien, C.S.Lewis, folk tales, and of his new ballad rendering of the Arthurian legend. He also talks beautifully, with great clarity about what the imaginations role in human creativity is. Here are a few salient extracts from that conversation on this subject matter, which I have judiciously edited where I felt necessary for improved comprehension.
"The world itself is a language."
"We have been so busy weighing and measuring (things) for the last three hundred years, we've forgotten what they mean."
" You could say your whole life could be seen as a slowly evolving poem.... You are God's poem."
"We live in a world where all kinds of analogies, parables, symbols and metaphors are naturally and richly available to us. But there is a reason why that rational analytical mind doesn't get how to do that, it can't make that leap. That is the imaginations business. The imagination is precisely to see the thing out there, and recognise that the visible thing out there, is more than itself. That it provides you with an image through which to think about what is in here ( in us)."
"The imagination is the faculty by which we apprehend meaning, not just information."
"How do we get from apprehension to comprehension, of things that are true, but not divisible or a weighable part of the material realm? We have been used to seeing the imagination as something that just makes stuff up. It's some airy fairy little whimsy of our own, that has no purchase on reality, as it really is.
And it is true we can make up things that have no purchase on reality. But it's also equally true that when we tell stories, when we paint pictures, when we write poems, we can create a verbal or visible form which embodies, which bodies forth things we need to know, and might not be able to know in any other way.
In fact, the idea that the poetic imagination enables a certain kind of knowledge, that it is a truth bearing faculty is clear when Shakespeare says 'imagination bodies forth things unknown.' They are there, they are real, but they are unknown to us, and we only faintly apprehend them."
"Essentially, when we read a great poem or look at a great painting, its as though things half known or reached after or faintly apprehended have suddenly come and made a home in this place. You walk through the door of the poem into the local habitation of the poem, and you meet them."
.jpg)
